Liar, Liar Chanel Dress on Fire

Dino filled you in yesterday on the fashion faux pas of a lifetime – Reese Witherspoon wore the same dress to the Golden Globes that Kiki Snaggletooth Dunst (ugh!) wore like a while ago to some other event. So, how did this happen you ask?

Apparently Chanel told Reese this dress was “vintage.” When I think “vintage” I tend to imagine something, say, my grandma would’ve worn in her pre-gray hair era. Apparently to Chanel, “vintage” means it’s from 2003. So, it’s not really sold anymore but they decided to cut Reese a break and sell it to her which was a great idea (because she looks fabulous) until she pranced onto the red carpet and people realized a troll already wore the same dress like a few years ago on a...um...brown carpet. Karl, honey, did you think nobody would notice? Are you now officially as crazy as you look? Not cool Chanel, not cool.

Apparently Witherspoon’s rep, Nancy Ryder, is so pissed at Chanel she’s vowed not to accept anything from the fashion house for Reese or her other clients. This means we won’t be seeing J.Ho or Renee Zellweger in Chanel anytime soon. I don't know if I should be excited or upset about this...or maybe Nance can do us all a favor and lock both of those hags in a closet so we don't have to see them at all...

Between this incident, the rumored Lindsay Lohan modeling contract and all of the cheap, fake Chanel bags I see on the metro, I wouldn’t put my hypothetical clients in Chanel either. Chanel is going from class to trash. Coco probably just did a 360 in her grave.